The Choice Between Physical Firewall And Firewall Virtual Appliance

There are a few contemplations of the firewall virtual appliance that is basic. A firewall virtual appliance that can't benefit from hardware acceleration is probably not going to deliver the same level of performance from a physical firewall. But, the software architecture will have any kind of effect, so it is critical to consider firewall virtual appliance with software architectures that improve performance and lessens latency.

It is also important to understand what highlights are supported by the firewall virtual appliance in this condition. The virtualized network security offering has multiplied and numerous sellers, in an effort to take part in the virtualization and cloud buzz just repackage their physical firewalls in a firewall virtual appliance without consideration for the necessities in a virtualized environment.

At the opposite end, you have virtualization platform vendors with a firewall virtual appliance that understand the dynamic idea of the environment, yet don't offer the suitable security functions. Current dangers to the network don't leave since you virtualized your environment. Cybercriminals are using new, refined, and coordinated procedures like exploits, malware, and spyware to rupture your system.

Application engineers are deploying applications and leveraging open ports on the firewall to bypass security. Stakeholders, contractors, and mobile users need access to your applications regardless of where they are. It is therefore important for the firewall virtual appliance to understand applications beyond ports and protocol, support user-based policies, and incorporate a total threat framework to manage current dangers.

You require firewall virtual appliance that already handles the challenge of safe application enablement, yet is dynamic enough to understand virtual machine development, and can coordinate with orchestration software.

Firewall virtual appliance won't assume control and replace physical firewalls in the data center. In view of the stringent performance requirements in the data center, physical firewalls won't leave. In a few situations, they might be the main decision. In others, they may be used for perimeter data center filtering because of the throughput required. In most hybrid environments, a mix of physical and the firewall virtual appliance will be deployed. The physical firewall segments between virtualized servers, so the correct sets of users are getting to the virtualized servers. Then, the firewall virtual appliance delivers segmentation inside the server.

Another valuable advantage of this architecture is that the physical firewalls ensuring the virtualized servers can now also shield against hypervisor vulnerabilities. Securing against hypervisor attacks requires hypervisor integrity and software hardening by the virtualization seller. But, complementary security that gives suitable access to the hypervisor and reviews for virtualization platform vulnerabilities is critical. This can't be accomplished by the firewall within the server itself. All things considered, if you already have access to the hypervisor by means of an attack, you control the whole server.

In summary, the data center environment is moving towards automated, dynamic, on-demand benefits. Security architectures must stay aware of these evolving requirements and also deal with the realities of threat insurance and safe application enablement challenges that never left. Network security for virtualized data center and cloud environments should deliver all security highlights like safe application enablement and flexible networking integration, must track virtual machine instantiation via security policies, and deliver a consistent management for all security appliances in the data center.

Comodo, a worldwide innovator and developer of cybersecurity solutions and the global pioneer in digital certificates, released Comodo Dome Firewall 2.0, an all-in-one Unified Threat Management (UTM) virtual appliance, which provides a far-reaching suite of boundary and network security features, installed on-premises and free of charge.

Comodo Dome Firewall is the only free UTM solution globally that meets the Common Criteria (CC) EAL 4+ certification, showing that it meets an agreed-upon international information security standard for government deployments. CC EAL 4+ certification guarantees clients that Comodo Dome Firewall 2.0 has been assessed and confirmed by an unbiased, third-party research center. CC certifications are commonly recognized by 26 countries.

Comodo Dome Firewall 2.0 consolidates the features and administration of traditionally divided point solutions inside a unified dashboard, providing IT managers and teams with visibility and control.

Comodo Dome Firewall 2.0 Virtual Appliance is a fundamental layer of the Comodo Dome Security-as-a-Service (SECaaS) product family. Comodo provides paid offerings with extra security for clients who need to extend their insurance. Clients can settle on full security web gateway functionality with portable file containment, an anti-spam gateway, data loss prevention, and different highlights.

For more information, visit comodo.com. Stay up with the most recent Comodo News from the Comodo blog at https://blog.comodo.com/ and on Twitter @ComodoNews. Connect with Comodo on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/company/comodo.